Showing posts with label SIDS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SIDS. Show all posts

01 June 2014

Cockroaches and Elephants

I read a sad article this past week (which, when juxtaposed with idiot deniers still insisting that nothing's happening and it's all a hoax, made me cry) about what's happening to the small island nations in the Pacific. 

In The Nations Guaranteed to Be Swallowed by the Sea, by Stephen Leahy, we learn how bad it's getting: 

  • homes are being destroyed by rising sea levels
  • some island atolls have been lost
  • coffins and skeletons from graves are washing away
  • full moon high tides are bringing salt water into streets
  • people are moving further inland, but the islands are so small, they can't move much further
  • shorelines are eroding
  • groundwater and agricultural fields are being salinated by salt water intrusion

People in island-based countries and communities that are, literally, disappearing (you've heard me talk about those who are "losing their homes and entire homelands") have started wondering what they've done to deserve this. 

An alarmed Wayne Andrew is the head of a reef protection organization in Palau. According to him, "Local people wonder what they've done wrong and 'why they have to pay the ultimate price when other nations are benefiting from all this,' referring to wealthy nations' high CO2 emissions." Hearing that breaks my heart.

According to Tony de Brum, Foreign Minister of the Marshall Islands, "'There is no sense of urgency. It's frustrating' .... Countries with the biggest CO2 emissions are more concerned about their economies than the survival of small island nations," he suggested.

de Brum offered an evocative analogy: "'By the time the rest of the world awakes to [the] crisis, we've drowned,' he said. 'We are like cockroaches trying to herd elephants.'"

That reminded me of this African proverb: "If you don't think you can make a difference, if you don't think you have power, if you think your voice is too small to be heard, then you've never been in a tent with a mosquito." I've also heard that mosquitoes can force migrations of large animals, such as the caribou herds of Alaska. 

Add to that this statistic I just heard: on average, you have to talk to someone seven times before they will buy what you're selling.

Can we give world leaders and climate conference negotiators credit for being as wise and intelligent as elephants? Probably not. But if we make pests of ourselves, like cockroaches and mosquitoes do, perhaps they will do the right thing in New York (September 2014), Lima (December 2014) and Paris (end of 2015) -- just to shut us up and get rid of us.

So folks, it's a call to wings (rather than arms)! Start buzzin' around their ears (and walkin' up their walls) and maybe they'll start listening. 

Here's to a climate change agreement that saves the world from us. From New York and Lima to Paris, or bust -- for the sake of all the children, of all species, and all future generations, for all time.

02 October 2009

65 Days - The Problem is Another Kind of NIMBYism

You know what NIMBY means, right? It stands for Not In My BackYard. And it is still quite common, for example, amongst people fighting the installation of wind farms. (Have you seen "The Age of Heartbreak, er, Stupid" yet?)

It struck me the other day that the reason the climate change emergency has not garnered the attention it deserves is another form of NIMBYism. Because it's not in my backyard, I can't see it (don't see it; won't see it) and therefore I don't care about it.

I've started getting angry with people who talk like that. As though the children dying from drought in Africa are not our children. As though the people losing their homelands in the Pacific are not our brothers and sisters. As though the Inuit in the Arctic who are losing their homes and their ancient way of life are not our relations.

Even Mr. Compassion himself, the Dalai Lama, didn't talk about climate change until he realized that the glaciers in Tibet were melting. (It seems a little attachment is a good thing these days.)

Don't people realize that what's happening to the children in Africa now will very soon be happening to our own children, here in our own backyards?

It's still amazing how many people refuse to see what is not right in front of their noses. Maybe we need to give everyone a nose that reaches to Africa and the Maldives and the Arctic!

Damn it, where is Pinocchio when we need him?

(With thanks to André Koehne for the art.)

17 July 2009

142 Days to Copenhagen - I Have an Idea for All the Deniers!

Climate change deniers give me the creeps, especially when I meet them in person. My most recent up close encounter was with a purportedly intelligent and "spiritual" fellow who confided that we don't have to worry about climate change, because we'll all be able to teleport to another planet.


Not in my lifetime, Dude! Not enough spiritual people on this planet to make it happen, I'm afraid.


What I'm reading online these days is a new line that hints at desperation on the part of deniers: that global warming is a hoax perpetrated by governments so that they can tax us to death. How I wish that governments were actually in on this with us. No, dear deniers, governments are not "taxing us to death" over climate change. (Now, that illegal invasion of Iraq and the trillions of dollars in American debt - that might be a different story.)


So, calling all deniers. I have an idea for you. Why don't you take a nice long vacation in the exotic Pacific island nation of Kiribati ... perhaps on lovely Tebua Tarawa Island, or Abanuea Island.


Oh, sorry. Those islands have disappeared! How about the village of Lateu in Vanuatu? Nope, gone. How about Tuvalu? Sorry, it's disappearing, too. How about the Cook Islands, Micronesia, Fiji, Papua New Guinea, the Marshall Islands ... nope, sorry, all going the same way.


How about Zanzibar then? Or a nice trip to the Arctic? Disappearing.


I invite you to visit these beautiful places (the ones not yet entirely lost to the sea) and tell the people whose homelands are disappearing that global warming is a hoax perpetrated by the government so that they can tax us to death.


And be sure to look them right in the eyes when you're telling them that.

15 July 2009

144 Days to Go - Let's Do Some Compassion Math

If you watched the David Suzuki speech on the 145 Days post, you'll have heard some sad statistics.


The world's 50 least developed countries (LDCs) have contributed less than 1 one percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, but are reaping over 95 per cent of the impacts.


Here are those numbers are again:

50 LDCs + <1% ghgs =" ">95% of impacts

And here are those countries (in alphabetical order):

  1. Afghanistan
  2. Angola
  3. Bangladesh
  4. Benin
  5. Bhutan
  6. Burkina Faso
  7. Burundi
  8. Cambodia
  9. Cape Verde
  10. Central African Republic
  11. Chad
  12. Comoros
  13. Democratic Republic of the Congo
  14. Djibouti
  15. Equatorial Guinea
  16. Eritrea
  17. Ethiopia
  18. Gambia
  19. Guinea
  20. Guinea-Bissau
  21. Haiti
  22. Kiribati
  23. Lao People's Democratic Republic
  24. Lesotho
  25. Liberia
  26. Madagascar
  27. Malawi
  28. Maldives
  29. Mali
  30. Mauritania
  31. Mozambique
  32. Myanmar
  33. Nepal
  34. Niger
  35. Rwanda
  36. Samoa
  37. Sao Tome and Principe
  38. Senegal
  39. Sierra Leone
  40. Solomon Islands
  41. Somalia
  42. Sudan
  43. Timor-Leste
  44. Togo
  45. Tuvalu
  46. Uganda
  47. United Republic of Tanzania
  48. Vanuatu
  49. Yemen
  50. Zambia

Check this UN webpage for the list of criteria for inclusion. Note the recommendation that the Maldives "graduate" from LDC status — I wonder if the fact that their country is disappearing due to global climate disruption and sea level rise will influence that decision.


Please visit Global Islands Network for information on all the small island nations that are disappearing.


My heart goes out to these countries and these people. Imagine this kind of poverty and lack of development exacerbated by the impacts of global warming. Once again, there but for the grace of the Universe go I.

12 June 2009

177 Days - Stonewalling the Climate Negotiations: Who's Winning While Life on Earth Loses?

It's scary watching what's going on at the UNFCCC international meetings leading up to the Copenhagen climate talks in December.

It's scary because many developed/industrialized/Annex 1 countries continue to stonewall the talks (including, I'm ashamed to say, the representatives of my country's minority right-wing, in-Big-Oil's-pocket government).

Many of the Small Island Developing States (SIDS) are literally begging for their survival, and we fat cats just can't seem to see that their fate has anything to do with us — or ours.

The people and countries who gain from obfuscating and obviating, and from being obstreperous and obnoxious, what do they believe they are gaining? What's truly in it for them? If life is just a game (survival, obviously, is not a game) to these people and countries, why won't they even consider making it a cooperative game rather than a highly competitive one?

The planet's survival is not a zero-sum game, as in if "they" lose, we win. No, if anyone loses this game, we all lose. The atmosphere and the biosphere belong to every living being on Earth.

What outright imperious arrogance for some people and countries that they are so narrow in their view of winning the climate battle that they can't see past their own borders. It's criminal.

Has it not reached the point where these people and countries should be charged with crimes against humanity? And left out of the negotiations?